Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Foundation of Public Utility

Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: state of the art

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record Devleesschauwer, B. en_US Bouwknegt, M. en_US Dorny, P. en_US Gabriel, S. en_US Havelaar, A. H. en_US Quollin, S. en_US Robertson, L. en_US Speybroeck, N. en_US Torgerson, P. R. en_US Van Der Gissen, J. en_US Trevisan, C. en_US 2019-06-04T12:22:24Z 2019-06-04T12:22:24Z 2017 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2405-6766 en_US
dc.identifier.doi en_US
dc.identifier.other en_US
dc.identifier.other ITG-B3A; DBM; U-VHELM; DOI; PDF; Abstract; ITMPUB; DSPACE65 en_US
dc.description.abstract In a time of increasing threats and decreasing financial resources, monitoring and controlling all possible foodborne hazards at the same time and to the same extent has become more challenging than ever. Therefore, attention is increasingly being paid to the so-called "risk ranking" methods that enable decision makers to focus on the most important foodborne hazards - even when time is limited and knowledge incomplete. In this review paper, we provide an overview of the most common quantitative methods and metrics used for ranking the risks associated with foodborne parasites and present the state of the art on risk ranking exercises for foodborne parasites. A number of risk ranking metrics and methods are available, ranging from simple approaches that can be used to assess the health or economic impact of a foodborne parasitic disease, to more complicated but more comprehensive multi-criteria assessments. For health impact assessment, measures of population health such as disease occurrence and number of deaths; Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) measuring the healthy life years lost; and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) measuring the number of life years lived in optimal health, are described. For economic impact assessment, applied approaches that measure the cost-of-illness from a societal perspective and stated preference methods are outlined. Finally, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which can be used to integrate multiple metrics and criteria into a single ranking, is described. These risk ranking methods for foodborne parasites are increasingly performed to aid priority setting at global, regional, and national levels. As different stakeholders have their own prioritization objectives and beliefs, the outcome of such exercises is necessarily context-dependent. Therefore, when designing a risk ranking exercise for foodborne parasites, it is important to choose the metrics and methods, as well as what to rank, in the light of the predefined context of the question being addressed and the target audience. en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject Foodborne diseases en_US
dc.subject Parasitic diseases en_US
dc.subject Risk ranking en_US
dc.title Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: state of the art en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.citation.issue 1 en_US
dc.citation.jtitle Food and Waterborne Parasitology en_US
dc.citation.volume 8-9 en_US
dc.citation.abbreviation Food Waterborne Parasitol en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record