Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Foundation of Public Utility

Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster randomised trial

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vanlerberghe, V.
dc.contributor.author Toledo, M. E.
dc.contributor.author Rodríguez, M.
dc.contributor.author Gomez, D.
dc.contributor.author Baly, A.
dc.contributor.author Benitez, J. R.
dc.contributor.author Van der Stuyft, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-14T12:57:31Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-14T12:57:31Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.issn 0959-8146
dc.identifier.doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1959
dc.identifier.other ITG-H1A
dc.identifier.other ITG-HLA
dc.identifier.other HEALTH
dc.identifier.other U-EPID
dc.identifier.other JIF
dc.identifier.other DOI
dc.identifier.other UPD16
dc.identifier.other ABSTRACT
dc.identifier.other FTA
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10390/2730
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of an integrated community based environmental management strategy to control Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue, compared with a routine strategy. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Guantanamo, Cuba. PARTICIPANTS: 32 circumscriptions (around 2000 inhabitants each). INTERVENTIONS: The circumscriptions were randomly allocated to control clusters (n=16) comprising routine Aedes control programme (entomological surveillance, source reduction, selective adulticiding, and health education) and to intervention clusters (n=16) comprising the routine Aedes control programme combined with a community based environmental management approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was levels of Aedes infestation: house index (number of houses positive for at least one container with immature stages of Ae aegypti per 100 inspected houses), Breteau index (number of containers positive for immature stages of Ae aegypti per 100 inspected houses), and the pupae per inhabitant statistic (number of Ae aegypti pupae per inhabitant). RESULTS: All clusters were subjected to the intended intervention; all completed the study protocol up to February 2006 and all were included in the analysis. At baseline the Aedes infestation levels were comparable between intervention and control clusters: house index 0.25% v 0.20%, pupae per inhabitant 0.44x10(-3) v 0.29x10(-3). At the end of the intervention these indices were significantly lower in the intervention clusters: rate ratio for house indices 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.88) and rate ratio for pupae per inhabitant 0.27 (0.09 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: A community based environmental management embedded in a routine control programme was effective at reducing levels of Aedes infestation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN88405796. en
dc.language English en
dc.subject Viral diseases en
dc.subject Dengue en
dc.subject Control strategies en
dc.subject Community participation en
dc.subject Vector control en
dc.subject Aedes aegypti en
dc.subject Environmental measures en
dc.subject Community-based en
dc.subject Effectiveness en
dc.subject Cuba en
dc.subject Caribbean en
dc.subject America, Latin en
dc.title Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster randomised trial en
dc.type Article en
dc.citation.issue 7709 en
dc.citation.jtitle BMJ en
dc.citation.volume 338 en
dc.citation.pages 1477-1480 en
dc.identifier.pmid http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19509031
dc.identifier.url http://lib.itg.be/pdf/itg/2009/2009bmjo1477.pdf
dc.citation.jabbreviation BMJ en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record