Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Foundation of Public Utility

Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record Cardoen, S. Van Huffel, X. Berkvens, D. Quoilin, S. Ducoffre, G. Saegerman, C. Speybroeck, N. Imberechts, H. Herman, L. Ducatelle, R. Dierick, K. 2009-12-18T09:30:37Z 2009-12-18T09:30:37Z 2009
dc.identifier.issn 1535-3141
dc.identifier.other ITG-A3A
dc.identifier.other ITG-A7A
dc.identifier.other ANIMAL
dc.identifier.other U-ANIMAL
dc.identifier.other JIF
dc.identifier.other DOI
dc.identifier.other UPD17
dc.identifier.other ABSTRACT
dc.identifier.other FTA
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES: To prioritize an extended list of food- and water-borne zoonoses to allow food safety authorities to focus on the most relevant hazards in the food chain. METHODS: An evidence-based semiquantitative methodology was developed. Scores were given by 35 scientific experts in the field of animal and public health, food, and clinical microbiology and epidemiology to 51 zoonotic agents according to five criteria related to public health (severity and occurrence in humans), animal health (severity of disease coupled with economic consequences and occurrence in animals), and food (occurrence in food). The scoring procedure was standardized and evidence-based as experts were provided, for each zoonotic agent, a same set of up-to-date help information data related to the five criteria. Independently, the relative importance of the five criteria was weighted by seven food chain risk managers. The zoonotic agents were ranked based on overall weighted scores and were grouped in four statistically different levels of importance. RESULTS: The following foodborne zoonotic pathogens were classified as "most important": Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli. A second group of "significant importance" included Toxoplasma gondii, the agent of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, Clostridium botulinum, Staphylococcus aureus, Cryptosporidium parvum, Mycobacterium bovis, Echinococcus granulosus, Streptococcus spp., Echinococcus multilocularis, Yersinia enterocolitica, Mycobacterium avium, Fasciola hepatica, Giardia intestinalis, and Rotavirus. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology allowed to rank 51 zoonotic agents with objectivity and taking account of a combined input from risk assessors and risk managers. Applications: These results support food safety policy makers to establish the multiannual monitoring program of foodborne zoonoses. They also enable to identify knowledge gaps on specific zoonotic agents and to formulate key research questions. Principally, this method of prioritization is of general interest as it can be applied for any other ranking exercise and in any country. en
dc.language English en
dc.subject Food safety en
dc.subject Foodborne diseases en
dc.subject Zoonoses en
dc.subject Screening en
dc.subject Monitoring en
dc.subject Priority setting en
dc.subject Methodology en
dc.subject Evidence-based en
dc.title Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses en
dc.type Article en
dc.citation.issue 9 en
dc.citation.jtitle Foodborne Pathogens and Disease en
dc.citation.volume 6 en
dc.citation.pages 1083-1096 en
dc.citation.jabbreviation Foodborne Pathog Dis en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record