DSpace
 

TropMed Central Antwerp >
C. Department of Public Health (1990-present) >
Dept. Public Health - Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10390/7254

Authors: Huybregts, L.
Houngbé, F.
Salpéteur, C.
Brown, R.
Roberfroid, D.
Ait-Aissa, M.
Kolsteren, P.
Title: The effect of adding ready-to-use supplementary food to a general food distribution on child nutritional status and morbidity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Journal Name: PLoS Medicine
Issue Date: 2012
Volume: 9
Issue: 9
Pages: e1001313
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001313
Pubmed ID: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028263
Language: English
Type: ARTICLE-E
Keywords: Nutrition status
Morbidity
Children
Wasting
Prevention strategies
Food supplementation
Food aid
Distribution
Health impact
Anthropometry
Measurement
Linear growth
Hemoglobin
Anemia
Diarrhea
Fever
Randomized controlled trials
Chad
Africa, Central
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recently, operational organizations active in child nutrition in developing countries have suggested that blanket feeding strategies be adopted to enable the prevention of child wasting. A new range of nutritional supplements is now available, with claims that they can prevent wasting in populations at risk of periodic food shortages. Evidence is lacking as to the effectiveness of such preventive interventions. This study examined the effect of a ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) on the prevention of wasting in 6- to 36-mo-old children within the framework of a general food distribution program. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled pragmatic intervention study in a sample of 1,038 children aged 6 to 36 mo in the city of Abeche, Chad. Both arms were included in a general food distribution program providing staple foods. The intervention group was given a daily 46 g of RUSF for 4 mo. Anthropometric measurements and morbidity were recorded monthly. Adding RUSF to a package of monthly household food rations for households containing a child assigned to the intervention group did not result in a reduction in cumulative incidence of wasting (incidence risk ratio: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.11; p = 0.25). However, the intervention group had a modestly higher gain in height-for-age (+0.03 Z-score/mo; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.04; p<0.001). In addition, children in the intervention group had a significantly higher hemoglobin concentration at the end of the study than children in the control group (+3.8 g/l; 95% CI: 0.6, 7.0; p = 0.02), thereby reducing the odds of anemia (odds ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82; p = 0.004). Adding RUSF also resulted in a significantly lower risk of self-reported diarrhea (-29.3%; 95% CI: 20.5, 37.2; p<0.001) and fever episodes (-22.5%; 95% CI: 14.0, 30.2; p<0.001). Limitations of this study include that the projected sample size was not fully attained and that significantly fewer children from the control group were present at follow-up sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Providing RUSF as part of a general food distribution resulted in improvements in hemoglobin status and small improvements in linear growth, accompanied by an apparent reduction in morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01154595 Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Appears in Collections:Dept. Public Health - Articles

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormatALL2013-5
2012pmede1001313.pdf536,97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2008  The DSpace Foundation - Feedback